So I know your first thought
when looking at this picture is "what in the world is going on here?"
Let me explain:
This is
a picture of guys and girls on varying levels in life. The levels represent
maturity, spirituality, intelligence, chivalry, physical physique, and all
other differences in virtues and characteristics. As demonstrated by the
drawing, everyone is on a different level in life. Additionally as different
aspects or characteristics are considered, this snapshot (ignoring all the
arrows) would change and the majority would swap places and move up or down.
On the rare occasion you could get someone who is the cream-of-the-crop in
nearly all aspects and wouldn't move at all. Or on the opposite end you could
get someone on the bottom of the totem pole who doesn't have anything going for
them in life and doesn't try to improve anything. Although, I don't think
either are actually possible, as even the cream-of-the-crop people have things
to work on, and the people at the bottom of the totem pole have strengths in
some areas even if they don't know it.
Logically
thinking, one would look at all the various snapshots of their various
potential companions and then choose the person that has the best qualities
minus the opportunity cost. (By-the-way, this is a marketing equation.
Perceived Value = Benefits - Cost.) So if the qualities that the person views as
a higher priority are greater than the sacrifice of the other qualities,
they'll take the risk and go for the person on the level they are looking for.
It's
important to note here that this diagram and analysis is designed for people
looking for a potential spouse or long term relationship and not simply a
one-night-stand or a temporal relationship with the intent to use someone for
their own personal gratifications. Although the latter reason might explain one
possible reason for why the arrows are drawn the way they are.
So now comes the analysis of
the arrows, the confusing part. (Note: all of these arrows are drawn representing what we, the guys, see. A girl's perspective on this matter is probably entirely different from a guy's perspective).
Alright
we'll start with the "Golden Relationship:" So, in my mind this is
the relationship that makes the most sense and what I believe everyone should
be striving for. In this relationship the guy and the girl are pretty much on
the same level. However if you look at things from the guys perspective he sees
the girl on a higher level than himself. The same is true from the girls
perspective, the guy is on a higher level. Thus each are equal, yet see each
other on a higher plane and capable of lifting each other to a higher plane. I
believe such a relationship would help both the guy and the girl achieve their
fullest potential.
Next
we'll go over to the "Most Common" relationships that I have seen and
continue to see. Girls go after guys that don't at all measure up to the girl.
It appears that girls lower their standards to attract the guy. Why though? Why
sell yourself short? Okay, if the guy who is the cream-of-the crop is a little
bit out of your league, why not go for the next best? Why go all the way to the
bottom of the ladder? (The red arrow is the shocked viewpoint of the guys when
this happens, who all wonder "How did she end up
with him?") 3 answers that I can think of are these: 1. The girl
doesn't recognize her own potential, and sees the guy at the bottom of the
ladder higher up than herself (like the green arrow). 2. She wants a guy who is
at a lower level than herself, for her own motives, whatever they may be. (Such
as desiring to stay in her comfort zone, and not wanting to rise to a higher
level, or live a higher life.) 3. She is going for this guy because she feels
there are no better options (because of the lack of "men" in
society), and this is the best she can do. Somehow to me all of these options
just seem like a red flag, and the beginnings of a relationship that is
destined to fail.
I
didn't include a chart with the arrows pointing from the guys, because for
the most part any woman we go for is a step above who we are. There are
however guys that go for girls on a lower level than themselves, but those who
do that are doing it mainly to satisfy natural appetites and personal
pleasures. In which case a girl who allowed a guy to treat her like that is
probably on the same level as him, at least we'd hope, and isn't a girl who has
lowered her standards to indulge also in that temporal pleasure.
Thus the great question and
call to action:
Why do
we lower our standards, and our vision on both sides?!
If a girl feels that a
guy at the bottom of the totem pole is the best they can get, then that is our
fault. Too many of us are selling ourselves short of our potential and forcing
girls to feel inclined to lower their standards to match ours. This shouldn't
ever be the case, but it is. As a society we are all continually lowering our
standards and selling ourselves shorter and shorter. The vision of our true
potential has almost become lost and not even known to us anymore.
Well,
now is the time to change! Now is the time to stand a little taller and be a
little better.
Girls,
it's time to rise up and be Women!
Guys,
it's time to rise up and be Men!

1 comments:
An example would be Natalie Portman with Anikan vs. Natalie Portman with Thor
Post a Comment